Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mitchell Krueger vs Nick Chappell Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Krueger vs Chappell analysis and find out who is favored!
Mitchell Krueger vs Nick Chappell Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Krueger 2 - 0 Chappell
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Krueger has won 52.51% of points on their second serve, while Chappell has won 48.45%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Krueger, in recent form, has won 51.42% of their opponent's second serve points, while Chappell has won 49.27%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.87% and 31.52% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Krueger has saved 59.75% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chappell has saved 54.9% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Krueger has won 58.57% of matches played (W/L 41/ 29), with Chappell winning 50% (W/L 40/ 40) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Krueger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 115/ 90), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 8/ 14). Chappell has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 217/ 150), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Krueger has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.93% of matches (W/L 33/ 23), where as Chappell has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.27% of matches (W/L 31/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Krueger winning 2 times and Chappell being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Krueger winning 4 and Chappell winning 1. The last match between Krueger and Chappell was at the Cleveland Challenger, 30-01-2023, First, I.hard with Mitchell Krueger getting the victory 6-3 7-6(4).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:17:37.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Krueger and Chappell have played a deciding set 1 times, with Krueger winning 1 times and Chappell 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Krueger winning 1, and Chappell 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Krueger has played against opponents with an average rank of 283.66 while Chappell has played against players with an average rank of 234.47.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Krueger has won 36% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chappell has won 37% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Krueger has converted 42.38% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chappell has converted 39.81% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
189
Rank
135
High
30
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
468
Rank
329
High
31
Age
L
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
53% (406-359)
Career Total W/L
53% (303-269)
63% (26-15)
YTD W/L
40% (12-18)
$697,038
Career Prize Money
$24,525
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Mitchell Krueger vs Nick Chappell For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Krueger VS Chappell
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Mitchell Krueger | Nick Chappell |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 32 | 24 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:17:37 | 2:17:37 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (97/171) | 58% (112/194) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (72/97) | 59% (66/112) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (37/74) | 50% (41/82) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (10/24) | 55% (6/11) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (87/194) | 36% (62/171) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Nick Chappell
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
85)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
85)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
| 6-3 6-7(6) 7-5 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Nick Chappell
58%
(
62 of
106)
1st Serve %
58%
(
63 of
109)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
44 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
51 of
109)
113
Total Points Won
102
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mitchell Krueger | Nick Chappell |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (26/15) | 40% (12/18) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (60/36) | 42% (29/40) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (526/462) | 48% (304/334) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 73% (16/6) | 45% (9/11) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 56% (9/7) | 20% (1/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 40% (2/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.4 | 0.24 |
| Aces Total | 194 | 75 |
| DFs per game | 0.17 | 0.18 |
| DFs Total | 81 | 57 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:56:32 | 1:45:13 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 336.88 | 265.63 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (2006/3122) | 62% (1238/2012) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (1405/2006) | 66% (817/1238) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (586/1116) | 48% (375/774) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (128/302) | 40% (84/211) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (1310/3267) | 39% (807/2095) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 68% (25/12) | 18% (2/9) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 53% (10/9) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (26/41) | 40% (12/30) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 62% (16/26) | 0% (0/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 43% (6/14) | 44% (4/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (26/23) | 77% (13/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 12% (26/3) | 23% (13/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (15/3) | 12% (17/2) |
Mitchell Krueger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Mitchell Krueger
58%
(
61 of
106)
1st Serve %
58%
(
69 of
118)
6
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
47 of
69)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
40%
(
42 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
45 of
118)
109
Total Points Won
115
|
1-6 7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Yuta Shimizu
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
5
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Abedallah Shelbayh
55%
(
47 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
10
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Alexis Galarneau
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Aidan Mayo
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
50%
(
37 of
74)
12
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
20 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Liam Draxl
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
60 of
100)
8
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
100)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Mitchell Krueger
51%
(
56 of
110)
1st Serve %
66%
(
79 of
119)
6
Aces
14
5
Double Faults
3
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
51 of
79)
52%
(
28 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
38 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
49 of
119)
121
Total Points Won
108
|
7-6(3) 6-7(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
Player
Mitchell Krueger
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Filip Misolic
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
6
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
4
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Nick Chappell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Merida Aguilar
Player
Nick Chappell
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve %
57%
(
16 of
28)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
7 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
86%
(
24 of
28)
50
Total Points Won
11
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Nick Chappell
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
39%
(
16 of
41)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aidan Mayo
Player
Nick Chappell
61%
(
68 of
111)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
103)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
33%
(
37 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
115
Total Points Won
99
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
Player
Nick Chappell
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Kousuke Ogura
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Andres Delgadillo
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
10
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
Player
Nick Chappell
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Elijah Strode
70%
(
74 of
105)
1st Serve %
49%
(
50 of
102)
2
Aces
14
0
Double Faults
10
82%
(
61 of
74)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
41 of
50)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
24 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
30 of
102)
111
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(17) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Nick Chappell
60%
(
61 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
64 of
93)
0
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
37 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Santiago Ruiz Velasco
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Krueger Vs Chappell Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Krueger are available here and Chappell photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
